LLM Inference Optimization Part 4 — Production Serving
Production deployment with vLLM and TGI. Continuous Batching, Speculative Decoding, memory budget design, and throughput benchmarks.

LLM Inference Optimization Part 4 — Production Serving
This is the final part of the series. Here we cover how to combine the Attention optimizations, KV Cache management, and Sparse Attention techniques from Parts 1–3 in a real production environment.
The key tools are vLLM and TGI (Text Generation Inference). We'll walk through how these two engines integrate the optimizations we've learned, and how to configure them in practice — with code.
vLLM vs TGI — At a Glance
| Feature | vLLM | TGI (HuggingFace) |
|---|---|---|
| PagedAttention | Built-in | Built-in |
| Continuous Batching | Supported | Supported |
| Flash Attention | Supported | Supported |
| KV Cache Quantization | FP8 supported | Partial support |
| Model Quantization | AWQ, GPTQ, Marlin | AWQ, GPTQ, EETQ |
| Speculative Decoding | Supported | Supported |
| Multi-GPU (Tensor Parallel) | Supported | Supported |
| API Compatibility | OpenAI-compatible | Custom + OpenAI-compatible |
| Installation | pip install | Docker-based |
Related Posts

LLM Inference Optimization Part 3 — Sparse Attention in Practice
Sliding Window, Sink Attention, DeepSeek DSA, IndexCache, and Nvidia DMS. From dynamic token selection to Needle-in-a-Haystack evaluation.

LLM Inference Optimization Part 2 — KV Cache Optimization
KV Cache quantization (int8/int4), PCA compression (KVTC), and PagedAttention (vLLM). Hands-on memory reduction code and scenario-based configuration guide.

LLM Inference Optimization Part 1 — Attention Mechanism Deep Dive
Build Self-Attention from scratch. Compare MHA → GQA → MQA evolution in code. KV Cache mechanics and Prefill vs Decode analysis.